Robotic pool cleaners can look impressive under controlled conditions. The more meaningful test isn’t how a cleaner performs in a demonstration environment, but how it handles real-world conditions in an actual swimming pool over time.

Leaves, dirt, pet hair, changing weather, irregular pool geometry and everyday use can expose things that simply don’t show up during a short product demonstration.

That was the idea behind Pool Magazine’s recent evaluation of the iGarden K Series robotic pool cleaner.

Rather than conduct a short-term test, we placed the K Series with pool professional Kelli Clancy, owner of Legacy Pool and Spa in Sacramento, who installed the unit in one of her customer’s pools. The homeowner used the cleaner over an extended period, while Clancy monitored its performance and gathered feedback about what worked well and where the cleaner had limitations.

The result was a practical assessment of a cordless robotic cleaner that Clancy believes could make a compelling option for homeowners buying their first robot.

A Real Backyard Instead of a Test Tank

Clancy deliberately selected a pool that would give the K Series plenty to contend with.

“I chose this particular pool for a variety of reasons,” Clancy explained. “One, I knew the customer would give me honest feedback. I knew she would try and get everything she wanted out of the cleaner and give an honest review.”

The surrounding landscape also created a good mixture of debris.

“They had small leaves, big leaves, pine trees,” Clancy said. “So it was a variety of debris I wanted to be able to know if it could pick up.”

As luck would have it, an unrelated issue had also temporarily taken the pool’s circulation system offline, leaving the water somewhat dirtier than usual when the K Series arrived. That provided another opportunity to see how the cleaner handled real debris rather than a carefully prepared demonstration.

The pool itself presented an additional challenge. It was an older freeform gunite pool with curves, varying radiuses and features that would test the cleaner’s ability to navigate something considerably more complicated than a rectangular test pool.

For Clancy, that distinction matters when evaluating robotic cleaners.

“It’s not as authentic as putting it into somebody’s pool in an everyday yard where you have, you know, squirrels, and dogs, and wind, and rain, and all these varieties of things going on,” she said of controlled product demonstrations.

Strong First Impressions

Out of the box, the K Series made a favorable impression.

“I thought it had a very sleek look,” Clancy said. “It has a great look to it, you know, very modern. It wasn’t too bulky, which I did like about it.”

More important than aesthetics was the filtration system. The cleaner includes a fine-mesh filter that fits onto the debris canister, allowing it to capture smaller material in addition to larger debris.

“I really liked that it came with that so it can catch that fine debris such as dog hair or dirt,” Clancy said.

The cordless design was another immediate positive for the homeowner. She had previously owned another robotic cleaner that required placement on a charging base. The K Series offered a simpler arrangement.

“She liked on this one you could just plug it anywhere,” Clancy said. “You didn’t have to put it on a base, and it charged within three hours. She really liked that aspect of it.”

For a homeowner who wants a cleaner without adding another permanent charging station around the pool area, that simplicity can be an attractive feature.

Cleaning the Floor, Walls and Waterline

The K Series provides operating modes for floor cleaning as well as floor-and-wall cleaning. Once operating in the latter mode, Clancy found that the robot was capable of climbing the pool walls all the way to the waterline.

“It did go up the walls and did a good job at cleaning them,” she said. “So I really liked that about it.”

That capability stood out to the homeowner because previous cleaners she had owned did not provide the same wall-cleaning performance.

“That was a feature she really enjoyed,” Clancy said.

The robot also surprised Clancy by making its way onto the pool’s tanning ledge.

“It went up onto the tanning ledge. And that was surprising to me,” she said.

What impressed her most, however, was how quickly the K Series could make a noticeable difference.

“Me personally, watching it, I thought the cleaner did really well. I found that it cleaned the pool fairly quickly, which was really nice,” Clancy said. “So then if you have a party, you can just toss that in there and know within an hour that pool’s gonna be ready to go.”

Its ability to reach the waterline added another layer of cleaning.

“It climbs all the way up to clean the tile line, so that was really nice, too, if you haven’t brushed your tile in a while and have some leaves along there this will do a great job with that,” she added.

Handling Real Backyard Debris

Ultimately, a pool cleaner needs to pick things up, and Clancy came away impressed with the K Series’ ability to collect larger debris.

She specifically pointed to the tracks and intake design at the front of the cleaner.

“I think they got right with the tracks on the front where it’s collecting the debris,” Clancy said. “Those were very grippy, and when I watch it go over a pile of leaves, it was able to pull it in easily.”

Combined with the fine-mesh filtration, that gave the cleaner the ability to contend with the mixture commonly found in residential pools, including dirt, dog hair, leaves and pine needles.

Clancy sees that versatility as increasingly important as backyard landscaping becomes more elaborate and homeowners expect robotic cleaners to handle more than one specific type of debris.

Where Pool Geometry Matters

No robotic cleaner is necessarily going to perform identically in every swimming pool, and the K Series was no exception.

The test pool presented a particularly challenging combination of freeform curves and relatively narrow steps. The K Series has a fairly wide wheelbase, and Clancy observed that it could climb some steps but had difficulty stabilizing on others.

Importantly, she believed some of that behavior was specific to the dimensions of this particular pool.

“This particular issue may not be an issue in other pools, depending on the width of the steps,” Clancy explained. The steps in the test pool were approximately 10 inches wide, and she felt even slightly wider steps could have made it considerably easier for the robot to stabilize.

The irregular curves of the older freeform pool also occasionally presented navigation challenges. Based on what she observed, Clancy believes the K Series is likely to perform at its best in more geometrically shaped pools.

That doesn’t negate its performance in the test pool. The cleaner still climbed walls, reached the tile line, accessed the tanning ledge and collected a wide range of debris. It does, however, underscore something consumers should consider with any robotic cleaner: pool shape and feature dimensions can influence performance.

An Area With Room for Improvement

The primary area Clancy would like to see improved is app connectivity when the cleaner is submerged.

“The app needs a little improvement,” she said, noting that communication with the unit became less reliable once it was underwater.

For routine operation, however, Clancy found the cleaner itself straightforward to set up and use. When asked what might distinguish the K Series for someone comparing similarly priced robotic cleaners, she immediately pointed to that simplicity.

“Easy to program,” Clancy said. “It was pretty easy to program. I think that thing took maybe five minutes tops to program completely.”

The homeowner also appreciated a decidedly low-tech feature: the retrieval hook.

“That was one thing the homeowner did love was the hook that came with the cleaner actually worked,” Clancy said. Compared with another robot the homeowner had used, retrieving the K Series from the pool was considerably easier.

It may seem like a small consideration, but usability extends beyond how well a robot cleans. Charging it, programming it, removing it from the water and emptying the debris can determine whether a homeowner actually enjoys owning the product.

A Strong Entry Point Into Robotic Cleaning

With robotic cleaners now available across a wide range of prices and feature sets, one of the biggest questions is where a particular product fits.

For Clancy, the K Series occupies an appealing position for consumers who want to move into robotic cleaning without immediately jumping to the highest-priced equipment on the market.

“I would say it’s gonna be that middle ground customer, someone who’s looking for something that’s not the cheapest but not the most expensive,” she said. “Maybe more of your entry level robotic owner.”

Ease of use strengthens that argument.

“Overall, it seemed very easy to use for anybody, even somebody who doesn’t have ever used a robot,” Clancy said.

That may ultimately be one of the K Series’ strongest selling points. Robotic cleaners have become increasingly sophisticated, but sophistication isn’t necessarily what every homeowner wants. For someone purchasing their first cordless robotic cleaner, being able to charge it, program it quickly, drop it into the pool and retrieve a canister full of debris without a steep learning curve has considerable value.

Clancy’s final assessment carries additional weight because she doesn’t automatically endorse every cleaner she encounters.

“I could see this being a cleaner that I would recommend to people,” she said. “And I don’t recommend just any cleaner. I want something that actually works because, you know, it’s not a small price tag to get a robotic.”

After months in an actual customer’s backyard, the iGarden K Series showed itself to be an approachable cordless robotic cleaner with good debris pickup, wall and waterline cleaning, straightforward programming, convenient charging and thoughtful everyday usability.

There are areas where future generations could improve, particularly app connectivity and navigation around certain freeform curves or narrow features. Those considerations are worth understanding when matching any cleaner to a particular pool.

For homeowners looking to make the jump from traditional pool cleaning equipment to their first robotic cleaner, however, the K Series offers many of the capabilities that make robots attractive in the first place without making the experience unnecessarily complicated.

Should You Buy the iGarden K Series?

Yes.

The iGarden K Series makes the most sense for someone who wants to get into robotic pool cleaning without paying a premium for features they may not need. It’s a practical entry point into the category and, based on our real-world testing, capable enough to justify the investment.

That doesn’t mean it’s the perfect cleaner for every pool. More complex pool shapes and features deserve some consideration, and buyers expecting flawless app control may want to temper their expectations. But those shortcomings weren’t significant enough to change our overall opinion of the product.

What matters is whether the K Series delivers enough cleaning capability, convenience and usability to make owning one worthwhile. We think it does.

If you’ve been considering making the jump to a cordless robotic cleaner and want a capable unit without immediately moving into the upper end of the category, the iGarden K Series earns our recommendation.

And for an entry-level robotic cleaner, getting those fundamentals right matters most.

Ready to take a deeper dive?

Listen to our entire interview with Kelli Clancy about the iGarden K Series robot on the Pool Magazine podcast.

Robotic pool cleaners have become one of the fastest-moving equipment categories in the pool industry. Cordless operation, smarter navigation, app connectivity and increasingly autonomous cleaning have changed what pool owners expect from these machines—and created an increasingly crowded field of manufacturers looking for their attention.

WYBOT may appear to be one of the newer names competing for a piece of that market. The company behind the brand, however, is anything but new to robotic pool cleaning.

“We’ve actually been around for 20-plus years manufacturing robotic pool cleaners,” said Nathaniel Michaelis, General Manager and Vice President of the Americas for WYBOT. “About three years ago, we were innovating on behalf of other brands and we said, ‘Hey, why aren’t we doing this for ourselves?’”

That decision marked an important change in strategy. Rather than continuing to put its newest engineering behind other brands, the company began concentrating those innovations under WYBOT. Michaelis said the company continues to manufacture for some well-known brands in the pool industry, but its latest technology is now being developed for its own product lineup.

That history provides some useful context in a category where new robotic cleaner brands seem to appear almost overnight. WYBOT is a relatively young consumer-facing brand backed by considerably older manufacturing and engineering experience.

The bigger question is how the company intends to distinguish itself in an increasingly competitive market.

Where WYBOT Achieves Differentiation

Michaelis points to what WYBOT calls “meaningful innovation”—features designed to eliminate an actual step in pool maintenance rather than simply adding another feature or gimmick.

“I think the perfect example there is our newest launch, the WYBOT S3, which is the first self-emptying robotic pool cleaner,” Michaelis said. “So it’ll actually go out, clean your pool, come back, dock itself in the water, and empty all the debris that it just picked up.”

For Michaelis, that is representative of WYBOT’s larger philosophy.

“That tells the story of who we are and how we’re differentiating ourselves,” he said, describing an approach centered on meaningful innovation that improves the overall pool ownership experience.

That philosophy becomes easier to understand when looking at WYBOT’s two principal product families, the C Series and S Series.

While there is some crossover in technology, they occupy distinctly different positions in the lineup.

“The C Series is our core,” Michaelis explained. “C stands for core. And the C Series is where we try to bring the most meaningful innovation at the most accessible price points.”

In practical terms, the C Series is designed around the everyday residential pool owner. These are self-contained, battery-powered robotic cleaners intended to provide many of the capabilities consumers increasingly expect from cordless cleaners without moving into the price and feature territory of WYBOT’s flagship models.

That includes technology such as AI Vision, which Michaelis said allows the cleaner to identify and prioritize dirtier areas of the pool rather than treating every section of the vessel exactly the same.

“When you take a step up into the S Series, that’s when you get into our more premium products,” Michaelis said. “So you’ll get longer run times and battery life, more square footage for larger pools, and then that’s where we start to introduce some of those really cool features like in-the-water charging and self-emptying.”

Cutting the Cord Was Only the Beginning

Cordless operation itself represents an important shift in robotic pool cleaning. Traditional suction-side cleaners require hoses, while earlier generations of robotic cleaners remained tethered to power supplies. Removing those connections changes the ownership experience.

With WYBOT’s cordless technology, the process is intentionally straightforward: charge the cleaner, place it in the pool and select the appropriate cleaning mode. Depending on the model and setting, the robot can address the pool floor, walls, waterline and steps.

Once cleaning is complete, it returns to its retrieval point. WYBOT includes a hook that attaches to a standard pool pole, allowing the cleaner to be brought to the surface.

“What we’re trying to do with cordless technology is really simplify that experience of cleaning the pool,” Michaelis said.

The S Series starts from that cordless foundation and asks a different question: how many of those remaining interactions can be eliminated too?

Cordless cleaners solved the cord problem, but they created another routine. The cleaner still has to be removed from the pool to recharge.

Michaelis said WYBOT heard that complaint directly from customers.

“Yeah, it’s great that I don’t have a hose, which is truly something I’m looking for, but that one step further that I wish I didn’t have to take is removing the cleaner from the pool every time that it needs to be charged.”

That feedback led to the S2 Solar and S2 Solar Vision.

Instead of requiring the owner to retrieve the cleaner and connect it to a charger after each cycle, the robots can dock themselves along the side of the pool. A solar-powered dock charges the cleaner while it remains in the water.

“The sun charges the base. The base then charges the robot,” Michaelis explained. “The robot then can be set on a schedule to run Monday, Wednesday, Friday or however many days the pool owner would like it to run during the week.”

The result is a robotic cleaner beginning to function more like permanent automated pool equipment than an accessory that must manually be deployed and retrieved.

But WYBOT kept listening, and customers identified yet another point of friction.

“Our customers said, that’s great that it’s charging in the water,” Michaelis recalled hearing, “but I have to take the robot out to clean the basket.”

That became the problem targeted with the latest iteration, the S3, which incorporates the functionality of the S2 Solar Vision and now adds self-emptying capability. After completing its cleaning cycle, the robot returns to the dock and transfers collected debris into a separate poolside bin.

“All the pool owner or the pool pro is doing is taking that tray out and emptying that tray of all the debris and putting that tray back in,” Michaelis explained.

It’s a relatively simple action, but it represents something bigger happening within the category. First the hose disappeared. Then the power cord. Now charging, scheduling, docking and even emptying the onboard debris basket are becoming automated.

The Push Toward Less Human Interaction

That trajectory is familiar territory for Michaelis, whose background before joining WYBOT was in consumer robotics at iRobot.

“In any robotics industry, your goal is to make the user experience as autonomous as possible,” he said. “You want as little human interaction with your robots.”

The pool industry is beginning to follow the same path already seen in other consumer robotics categories. Navigation is becoming more sophisticated. AI-assisted systems can influence where a cleaner goes and how it approaches the pool. Battery technology has removed the tether. App connectivity provides another layer of control, while docking, solar charging and scheduled cleaning are reducing the need for owners to deploy equipment manually.

“Where I see the robotic pool cleaning industry heading is trying to make it as autonomous as possible,” Michaelis said, “trying to reduce the amount of human interaction that you have with your robots, and ensuring that they’re doing the jobs that they’re set out to do.”

For homeowners, that means convenience. For pool professionals, it can have an entirely different value proposition.

A Better Ownership Experience Builders Can Sell

For builders trying to connect with increasingly tech-savvy pool buyers, equipment has become another opportunity to differentiate the finished project.

A self-parking, self-charging and self-emptying robotic pool cleaner isn’t simply another piece of equipment sitting in the pool. It’s the kind of feature a builder can demonstrate during turnover and immediately show a customer how much of the routine maintenance process can happen automatically.

Michaelis sees that as a potential finishing touch on a premium pool package.

“On the builder side, it’s really going back to that innovation piece,” he said. “It’s a surprise and delight moment at the time of purchase.”

When builders are assembling an equipment package for a prospective pool owner, he said, “adding some self-emptying robotic pool cleaner is just the cherry on top for that customer and really provides that top-notch experience.”

That’s an important part of WYBOT’s positioning. The company isn’t simply trying to connect with consumers shopping online for another cleaner. It’s developing features that builders, retailers, and service professionals can put in front of their own customers as part of a better pool ownership experience.

For service companies, meanwhile, the conversation moves from convenience to productivity.

Why Service Pros Are Paying Attention

Discerning service companies looking to recommend best-in-class robotic cleaning technology have good reason to gravitate toward products offering greater autonomy and less human interaction.

The robot isn’t replacing the service professional. Instead, it can work in the background during the six days between weekly service visits, continually handling a portion of the physical cleaning workload before the technician ever arrives.

Michaelis said some pool companies already view robotic cleaners as an efficiency tool rather than an optional accessory.

“We constantly hear feedback from service companies on how many more doors they’re able to service, how many more pools they’re able to service, how quickly they can get pools done so that they can get to the next customer, and how many more they can fit within their route,” he said.

In fact, some have made automated cleaning a prerequisite for taking on a customer.

“We actually have some service companies that actually won’t service clients unless they have some sort of robotic cleaner in their pool so that they can be the most efficient when they’re stopping by on a weekly basis,” Michaelis said.

That changes the role a robotic cleaner can play in the relationship between the pool professional and homeowner.

A service company recommending a premium robotic cleaner isn’t necessarily selling its customer a replacement for professional service. It’s giving that customer a machine capable of working between visits while simultaneously giving its technicians a cleaner pool to work with when they arrive.

And as those robots become increasingly autonomous, the value proposition gets stronger.

A cleaner that has to be manually deployed, retrieved, charged, and emptied still asks quite a bit from the homeowner. A cleaner capable of following a schedule, parking itself, recharging and transferring its own debris asks considerably less.

For WYBOT, that’s where the S Series—and particularly products such as the S3—begins to stand out. It’s also where two decades of manufacturing robotic cleaners starts to matter more than how recently consumers began seeing the WYBOT name.

The brand may be relatively new to some pool owners and professionals, but the company behind it isn’t. Now, rather than innovating behind the scenes for other brands, WYBOT is putting that experience behind products designed to connect directly with homeowners and the professionals serving them.

Ready to take a deeper dive?

Listen to our entire conversation with Nathaniel Michaelis, General Manager and Vice President of the Americas for WYBOT on the Pool Magazine Podcast.

There is a difference between owning a swimming pool and having one that is ready to use. For many homeowners, automatic pool covers are increasingly part of what makes that possible.

Before construction begins, homeowners can spend months considering shape, finish, tile, lighting, water features, equipment and the details that will define how the finished backyard looks. Once the pool is complete, however, a different set of considerations takes over. The water must be kept clean and balanced. The pool may need to be heated. Water lost to evaporation must be replaced, and the pool remains a safety consideration whenever it is not in use.

Tom Dankel, vice president of Aquamatic Cover Systems, has worked in the automatic-cover business for more than four decades. Over that time, he has watched the role of automatic-cover systems expand beyond their traditional association with safety.

“Automatic pool covers intersect with nearly all of those realities,” Dankel said. “Long associated primarily with safety, they’re increasingly part of a broader ownership conversation involving energy use, water conservation, maintenance and how often a family actually uses their pool.”

He also sees the value in more immediate, practical terms.

“If you’ve got an uncovered pool that’s full of leaves and bugs, that’s very uninviting,” Dankel said. “A cover eliminates that. Your pool is cleaner and warmer, and consequently, you use the pool more.”

Keeping Heat, Water and Money in the Pool

The economics of pool ownership have changed substantially in recent years, particularly in California.

In June 2021, residential electricity in California averaged 23 cents per kilowatt-hour. By June 2026, the statewide average had climbed to 35 cents per kilowatt-hour—an increase of just over 50% in five years. Individual costs vary considerably, but the broader trend has made energy management a larger part of operating a pool.

“Here in San Jose, we’re over 40 cents a kilowatt hour,” Dankel said. “When you’re paying that much for energy, you start looking very closely at where you’re losing it and what you can do to reduce those operating costs.”

For an outdoor pool, evaporation is one of the primary pathways for heat loss. Heated water leaves the surface, taking energy with it, while replacement water may need to be chemically adjusted and reheated.

“With evaporative loss, you have chemical loss, and then you have to reheat and retreat that water,” Dankel said. “You’re in this cycle of loss, replenish and regenerate. With a cover, you’re interrupting that cycle.”

The financial effect varies with pool size, climate, wind exposure, utility rates, heating method, target temperature and how consistently the cover is used.

Dankel points to a roughly 30,000-gallon pool at his former California home. When uncovered, he said the circulation pump typically ran about eight hours per day. With regular cover use, he was able to reduce the schedule to approximately two hours while continuing to maintain the pool to his satisfaction.

A covered surface also keeps leaves, insects, pollen and windblown material out of the water, reducing what ultimately reaches the filtration system or has to be removed before someone swims.

Safety Is Not a Generic Claim

Safety remains one of the most important reasons homeowners consider automatic covers, but there is an important distinction between a product that covers a pool and one designed to perform as a safety cover.

“When people ask us about safety, they want to know, ‘Is an automatic pool cover safe? What testing is there?’” Dankel said. “ASTM set forth a standard back in 1991, and that’s what people want to know—that the cover has been tested and certified.”

In the United States, swimming-pool, spa and hot-tub safety covers are commonly evaluated against ASTM F1346, which establishes performance specifications and labeling requirements. A cover intended primarily to reduce evaporation, retain heat or limit debris may not meet the same requirements.

That distinction becomes particularly important with complex pool designs.

Homeowners increasingly request freeform curves, raised walls, integrated spas, rock features, vanishing edges and other details that do not naturally accommodate the straight, parallel tracks of a conventional automatic safety cover.

Trackless systems can accommodate some shapes that conventional tracks cannot, preserving more freedom in the pool design. That flexibility comes with an important limitation.

“We have systems that can be cut to different converging shapes because they’re trackless,” Dankel explained. “Those aren’t ASTM safety covers. They’re strictly designed with energy savings and maintenance in mind, not acting as a safety cover.”

The question, then, is not simply whether a pool can be covered, but what the homeowner expects that cover to accomplish.

Designing Beyond the Rectangle

Rectangular pools remain the most straightforward candidates for automatic pool covers. Their straight, parallel sides provide a natural operating path, and tracks and mechanisms can often be concealed beneath coping or incorporated into the surrounding structure.

Freeform pools require more planning, but they do not necessarily rule out a cover.

One solution is sometimes described as a “pool within a pool.” Rather than requiring the entire visible water shape to conform to the cover, the builder creates a rectangular cover zone within the larger design. Curves, shelves and other aesthetic elements can remain outside it.

“If you have a freeform pool, you can create that picture frame around it using encapsulation,” Dankel said. “Whatever the pool shape is outside of that, you create the receiver for the track and then build the deck on top of it.”

Alternative mounting components and encapsulated track systems have expanded the range of pools that can accommodate automatic-cover systems. Some projects require considerably more specialized solutions.

“We did a pool that was in the shape of a letter U,” Dankel said. “We had three different covers coming out of the floor of the pool to be able to handle that.”

The Decision Belongs on the Drawing

What can be accomplished often depends on when the automatic-cover conversation begins.

Track locations, coping profiles, mechanism placement, elevations and dimensional tolerances affect the finished installation. If the system is intended to disappear into the architecture, those elements need to be coordinated before construction advances too far.

Dankel has seen how a small layout issue can become a practical problem later.

“We were at one recently and the pool was four inches out of square,” he said. “You couldn’t see it initially just by looking at it, but preparation is the key. Making sure things are square or parallel and on the same horizontal plane is what allows everything to work the way it should.”

The discussion should begin with the homeowner’s priorities. Safety may be paramount, while another owner may be focused on heat retention, debris or extending the swimming season. Curves, raised walls and water features can further narrow the available options.

Answering those questions on the drawing gives the builder considerably more flexibility than trying to solve them in finished concrete.

A Second Opportunity During Renovation

The conversation can also happen years after original construction.

Families and priorities change. Someone may purchase a home with an existing pool and later have children or grandchildren spending time in the backyard. Energy and water costs may be considerably different from when the pool was built. Renovation provides another opportunity to consider how the pool will be used and maintained going forward.

Some remodels allow concealed components to be incorporated much as they would during new construction. Others are better suited to retrofit installations with visible tracks and mechanisms.

Dankel says retrofit automatic pool covers accounts for roughly 35% of Aquamatic’s annual production. Many customers, he said, begin researching covers themselves rather than hearing about the option from the pool professional.

“People buy a house, they’ve got two kids running around, and they want safety and energy savings, so they buy a retrofit cover,” Dankel said. “I’ve heard more times than I can count, ‘Had the builder only offered this to me at the time, I would’ve taken it.’”

For pool professionals, renovation provides a natural second chance to have that conversation.

The pool was built to be used. The fewer obstacles between the decision to swim and getting into the water, the closer the backyard comes to delivering the experience the homeowner envisioned in the first place.

Ready to Take a Deeper Dive?

Listen to our full conversation with Tom Dankel on the Pool Magazine Podcast for more on automatic pool covers, energy savings, safety, design considerations and retrofit opportunities.