Robotic pool cleaners can look impressive under controlled conditions. The more meaningful test isn’t how a cleaner performs in a demonstration environment, but how it handles real-world conditions in an actual swimming pool over time.

Leaves, dirt, pet hair, changing weather, irregular pool geometry and everyday use can expose things that simply don’t show up during a short product demonstration.

That was the idea behind Pool Magazine’s recent evaluation of the iGarden K Series robotic pool cleaner.

Rather than conduct a short-term test, we placed the K Series with pool professional Kelli Clancy, owner of Legacy Pool and Spa in Sacramento, who installed the unit in one of her customer’s pools. The homeowner used the cleaner over an extended period, while Clancy monitored its performance and gathered feedback about what worked well and where the cleaner had limitations.

The result was a practical assessment of a cordless robotic cleaner that Clancy believes could make a compelling option for homeowners buying their first robot.

A Real Backyard Instead of a Test Tank

Clancy deliberately selected a pool that would give the K Series plenty to contend with.

“I chose this particular pool for a variety of reasons,” Clancy explained. “One, I knew the customer would give me honest feedback. I knew she would try and get everything she wanted out of the cleaner and give an honest review.”

The surrounding landscape also created a good mixture of debris.

“They had small leaves, big leaves, pine trees,” Clancy said. “So it was a variety of debris I wanted to be able to know if it could pick up.”

As luck would have it, an unrelated issue had also temporarily taken the pool’s circulation system offline, leaving the water somewhat dirtier than usual when the K Series arrived. That provided another opportunity to see how the cleaner handled real debris rather than a carefully prepared demonstration.

The pool itself presented an additional challenge. It was an older freeform gunite pool with curves, varying radiuses and features that would test the cleaner’s ability to navigate something considerably more complicated than a rectangular test pool.

For Clancy, that distinction matters when evaluating robotic cleaners.

“It’s not as authentic as putting it into somebody’s pool in an everyday yard where you have, you know, squirrels, and dogs, and wind, and rain, and all these varieties of things going on,” she said of controlled product demonstrations.

Strong First Impressions

Out of the box, the K Series made a favorable impression.

“I thought it had a very sleek look,” Clancy said. “It has a great look to it, you know, very modern. It wasn’t too bulky, which I did like about it.”

More important than aesthetics was the filtration system. The cleaner includes a fine-mesh filter that fits onto the debris canister, allowing it to capture smaller material in addition to larger debris.

“I really liked that it came with that so it can catch that fine debris such as dog hair or dirt,” Clancy said.

The cordless design was another immediate positive for the homeowner. She had previously owned another robotic cleaner that required placement on a charging base. The K Series offered a simpler arrangement.

“She liked on this one you could just plug it anywhere,” Clancy said. “You didn’t have to put it on a base, and it charged within three hours. She really liked that aspect of it.”

For a homeowner who wants a cleaner without adding another permanent charging station around the pool area, that simplicity can be an attractive feature.

Cleaning the Floor, Walls and Waterline

The K Series provides operating modes for floor cleaning as well as floor-and-wall cleaning. Once operating in the latter mode, Clancy found that the robot was capable of climbing the pool walls all the way to the waterline.

“It did go up the walls and did a good job at cleaning them,” she said. “So I really liked that about it.”

That capability stood out to the homeowner because previous cleaners she had owned did not provide the same wall-cleaning performance.

“That was a feature she really enjoyed,” Clancy said.

The robot also surprised Clancy by making its way onto the pool’s tanning ledge.

“It went up onto the tanning ledge. And that was surprising to me,” she said.

What impressed her most, however, was how quickly the K Series could make a noticeable difference.

“Me personally, watching it, I thought the cleaner did really well. I found that it cleaned the pool fairly quickly, which was really nice,” Clancy said. “So then if you have a party, you can just toss that in there and know within an hour that pool’s gonna be ready to go.”

Its ability to reach the waterline added another layer of cleaning.

“It climbs all the way up to clean the tile line, so that was really nice, too, if you haven’t brushed your tile in a while and have some leaves along there this will do a great job with that,” she added.

Handling Real Backyard Debris

Ultimately, a pool cleaner needs to pick things up, and Clancy came away impressed with the K Series’ ability to collect larger debris.

She specifically pointed to the tracks and intake design at the front of the cleaner.

“I think they got right with the tracks on the front where it’s collecting the debris,” Clancy said. “Those were very grippy, and when I watch it go over a pile of leaves, it was able to pull it in easily.”

Combined with the fine-mesh filtration, that gave the cleaner the ability to contend with the mixture commonly found in residential pools, including dirt, dog hair, leaves and pine needles.

Clancy sees that versatility as increasingly important as backyard landscaping becomes more elaborate and homeowners expect robotic cleaners to handle more than one specific type of debris.

Where Pool Geometry Matters

No robotic cleaner is necessarily going to perform identically in every swimming pool, and the K Series was no exception.

The test pool presented a particularly challenging combination of freeform curves and relatively narrow steps. The K Series has a fairly wide wheelbase, and Clancy observed that it could climb some steps but had difficulty stabilizing on others.

Importantly, she believed some of that behavior was specific to the dimensions of this particular pool.

“This particular issue may not be an issue in other pools, depending on the width of the steps,” Clancy explained. The steps in the test pool were approximately 10 inches wide, and she felt even slightly wider steps could have made it considerably easier for the robot to stabilize.

The irregular curves of the older freeform pool also occasionally presented navigation challenges. Based on what she observed, Clancy believes the K Series is likely to perform at its best in more geometrically shaped pools.

That doesn’t negate its performance in the test pool. The cleaner still climbed walls, reached the tile line, accessed the tanning ledge and collected a wide range of debris. It does, however, underscore something consumers should consider with any robotic cleaner: pool shape and feature dimensions can influence performance.

An Area With Room for Improvement

The primary area Clancy would like to see improved is app connectivity when the cleaner is submerged.

“The app needs a little improvement,” she said, noting that communication with the unit became less reliable once it was underwater.

For routine operation, however, Clancy found the cleaner itself straightforward to set up and use. When asked what might distinguish the K Series for someone comparing similarly priced robotic cleaners, she immediately pointed to that simplicity.

“Easy to program,” Clancy said. “It was pretty easy to program. I think that thing took maybe five minutes tops to program completely.”

The homeowner also appreciated a decidedly low-tech feature: the retrieval hook.

“That was one thing the homeowner did love was the hook that came with the cleaner actually worked,” Clancy said. Compared with another robot the homeowner had used, retrieving the K Series from the pool was considerably easier.

It may seem like a small consideration, but usability extends beyond how well a robot cleans. Charging it, programming it, removing it from the water and emptying the debris can determine whether a homeowner actually enjoys owning the product.

A Strong Entry Point Into Robotic Cleaning

With robotic cleaners now available across a wide range of prices and feature sets, one of the biggest questions is where a particular product fits.

For Clancy, the K Series occupies an appealing position for consumers who want to move into robotic cleaning without immediately jumping to the highest-priced equipment on the market.

“I would say it’s gonna be that middle ground customer, someone who’s looking for something that’s not the cheapest but not the most expensive,” she said. “Maybe more of your entry level robotic owner.”

Ease of use strengthens that argument.

“Overall, it seemed very easy to use for anybody, even somebody who doesn’t have ever used a robot,” Clancy said.

That may ultimately be one of the K Series’ strongest selling points. Robotic cleaners have become increasingly sophisticated, but sophistication isn’t necessarily what every homeowner wants. For someone purchasing their first cordless robotic cleaner, being able to charge it, program it quickly, drop it into the pool and retrieve a canister full of debris without a steep learning curve has considerable value.

Clancy’s final assessment carries additional weight because she doesn’t automatically endorse every cleaner she encounters.

“I could see this being a cleaner that I would recommend to people,” she said. “And I don’t recommend just any cleaner. I want something that actually works because, you know, it’s not a small price tag to get a robotic.”

After months in an actual customer’s backyard, the iGarden K Series showed itself to be an approachable cordless robotic cleaner with good debris pickup, wall and waterline cleaning, straightforward programming, convenient charging and thoughtful everyday usability.

There are areas where future generations could improve, particularly app connectivity and navigation around certain freeform curves or narrow features. Those considerations are worth understanding when matching any cleaner to a particular pool.

For homeowners looking to make the jump from traditional pool cleaning equipment to their first robotic cleaner, however, the K Series offers many of the capabilities that make robots attractive in the first place without making the experience unnecessarily complicated.

Should You Buy the iGarden K Series?

Yes.

The iGarden K Series makes the most sense for someone who wants to get into robotic pool cleaning without paying a premium for features they may not need. It’s a practical entry point into the category and, based on our real-world testing, capable enough to justify the investment.

That doesn’t mean it’s the perfect cleaner for every pool. More complex pool shapes and features deserve some consideration, and buyers expecting flawless app control may want to temper their expectations. But those shortcomings weren’t significant enough to change our overall opinion of the product.

What matters is whether the K Series delivers enough cleaning capability, convenience and usability to make owning one worthwhile. We think it does.

If you’ve been considering making the jump to a cordless robotic cleaner and want a capable unit without immediately moving into the upper end of the category, the iGarden K Series earns our recommendation.

And for an entry-level robotic cleaner, getting those fundamentals right matters most.

Ready to take a deeper dive?

Listen to our entire interview with Kelli Clancy about the iGarden K Series robot on the Pool Magazine podcast.

Robotic pool cleaners have become one of the fastest-moving equipment categories in the pool industry. Cordless operation, smarter navigation, app connectivity and increasingly autonomous cleaning have changed what pool owners expect from these machines—and created an increasingly crowded field of manufacturers looking for their attention.

WYBOT may appear to be one of the newer names competing for a piece of that market. The company behind the brand, however, is anything but new to robotic pool cleaning.

“We’ve actually been around for 20-plus years manufacturing robotic pool cleaners,” said Nathaniel Michaelis, General Manager and Vice President of the Americas for WYBOT. “About three years ago, we were innovating on behalf of other brands and we said, ‘Hey, why aren’t we doing this for ourselves?’”

That decision marked an important change in strategy. Rather than continuing to put its newest engineering behind other brands, the company began concentrating those innovations under WYBOT. Michaelis said the company continues to manufacture for some well-known brands in the pool industry, but its latest technology is now being developed for its own product lineup.

That history provides some useful context in a category where new robotic cleaner brands seem to appear almost overnight. WYBOT is a relatively young consumer-facing brand backed by considerably older manufacturing and engineering experience.

The bigger question is how the company intends to distinguish itself in an increasingly competitive market.

Where WYBOT Achieves Differentiation

Michaelis points to what WYBOT calls “meaningful innovation”—features designed to eliminate an actual step in pool maintenance rather than simply adding another feature or gimmick.

“I think the perfect example there is our newest launch, the WYBOT S3, which is the first self-emptying robotic pool cleaner,” Michaelis said. “So it’ll actually go out, clean your pool, come back, dock itself in the water, and empty all the debris that it just picked up.”

For Michaelis, that is representative of WYBOT’s larger philosophy.

“That tells the story of who we are and how we’re differentiating ourselves,” he said, describing an approach centered on meaningful innovation that improves the overall pool ownership experience.

That philosophy becomes easier to understand when looking at WYBOT’s two principal product families, the C Series and S Series.

While there is some crossover in technology, they occupy distinctly different positions in the lineup.

“The C Series is our core,” Michaelis explained. “C stands for core. And the C Series is where we try to bring the most meaningful innovation at the most accessible price points.”

In practical terms, the C Series is designed around the everyday residential pool owner. These are self-contained, battery-powered robotic cleaners intended to provide many of the capabilities consumers increasingly expect from cordless cleaners without moving into the price and feature territory of WYBOT’s flagship models.

That includes technology such as AI Vision, which Michaelis said allows the cleaner to identify and prioritize dirtier areas of the pool rather than treating every section of the vessel exactly the same.

“When you take a step up into the S Series, that’s when you get into our more premium products,” Michaelis said. “So you’ll get longer run times and battery life, more square footage for larger pools, and then that’s where we start to introduce some of those really cool features like in-the-water charging and self-emptying.”

Cutting the Cord Was Only the Beginning

Cordless operation itself represents an important shift in robotic pool cleaning. Traditional suction-side cleaners require hoses, while earlier generations of robotic cleaners remained tethered to power supplies. Removing those connections changes the ownership experience.

With WYBOT’s cordless technology, the process is intentionally straightforward: charge the cleaner, place it in the pool and select the appropriate cleaning mode. Depending on the model and setting, the robot can address the pool floor, walls, waterline and steps.

Once cleaning is complete, it returns to its retrieval point. WYBOT includes a hook that attaches to a standard pool pole, allowing the cleaner to be brought to the surface.

“What we’re trying to do with cordless technology is really simplify that experience of cleaning the pool,” Michaelis said.

The S Series starts from that cordless foundation and asks a different question: how many of those remaining interactions can be eliminated too?

Cordless cleaners solved the cord problem, but they created another routine. The cleaner still has to be removed from the pool to recharge.

Michaelis said WYBOT heard that complaint directly from customers.

“Yeah, it’s great that I don’t have a hose, which is truly something I’m looking for, but that one step further that I wish I didn’t have to take is removing the cleaner from the pool every time that it needs to be charged.”

That feedback led to the S2 Solar and S2 Solar Vision.

Instead of requiring the owner to retrieve the cleaner and connect it to a charger after each cycle, the robots can dock themselves along the side of the pool. A solar-powered dock charges the cleaner while it remains in the water.

“The sun charges the base. The base then charges the robot,” Michaelis explained. “The robot then can be set on a schedule to run Monday, Wednesday, Friday or however many days the pool owner would like it to run during the week.”

The result is a robotic cleaner beginning to function more like permanent automated pool equipment than an accessory that must manually be deployed and retrieved.

But WYBOT kept listening, and customers identified yet another point of friction.

“Our customers said, that’s great that it’s charging in the water,” Michaelis recalled hearing, “but I have to take the robot out to clean the basket.”

That became the problem targeted with the latest iteration, the S3, which incorporates the functionality of the S2 Solar Vision and now adds self-emptying capability. After completing its cleaning cycle, the robot returns to the dock and transfers collected debris into a separate poolside bin.

“All the pool owner or the pool pro is doing is taking that tray out and emptying that tray of all the debris and putting that tray back in,” Michaelis explained.

It’s a relatively simple action, but it represents something bigger happening within the category. First the hose disappeared. Then the power cord. Now charging, scheduling, docking and even emptying the onboard debris basket are becoming automated.

The Push Toward Less Human Interaction

That trajectory is familiar territory for Michaelis, whose background before joining WYBOT was in consumer robotics at iRobot.

“In any robotics industry, your goal is to make the user experience as autonomous as possible,” he said. “You want as little human interaction with your robots.”

The pool industry is beginning to follow the same path already seen in other consumer robotics categories. Navigation is becoming more sophisticated. AI-assisted systems can influence where a cleaner goes and how it approaches the pool. Battery technology has removed the tether. App connectivity provides another layer of control, while docking, solar charging and scheduled cleaning are reducing the need for owners to deploy equipment manually.

“Where I see the robotic pool cleaning industry heading is trying to make it as autonomous as possible,” Michaelis said, “trying to reduce the amount of human interaction that you have with your robots, and ensuring that they’re doing the jobs that they’re set out to do.”

For homeowners, that means convenience. For pool professionals, it can have an entirely different value proposition.

A Better Ownership Experience Builders Can Sell

For builders trying to connect with increasingly tech-savvy pool buyers, equipment has become another opportunity to differentiate the finished project.

A self-parking, self-charging and self-emptying robotic pool cleaner isn’t simply another piece of equipment sitting in the pool. It’s the kind of feature a builder can demonstrate during turnover and immediately show a customer how much of the routine maintenance process can happen automatically.

Michaelis sees that as a potential finishing touch on a premium pool package.

“On the builder side, it’s really going back to that innovation piece,” he said. “It’s a surprise and delight moment at the time of purchase.”

When builders are assembling an equipment package for a prospective pool owner, he said, “adding some self-emptying robotic pool cleaner is just the cherry on top for that customer and really provides that top-notch experience.”

That’s an important part of WYBOT’s positioning. The company isn’t simply trying to connect with consumers shopping online for another cleaner. It’s developing features that builders, retailers, and service professionals can put in front of their own customers as part of a better pool ownership experience.

For service companies, meanwhile, the conversation moves from convenience to productivity.

Why Service Pros Are Paying Attention

Discerning service companies looking to recommend best-in-class robotic cleaning technology have good reason to gravitate toward products offering greater autonomy and less human interaction.

The robot isn’t replacing the service professional. Instead, it can work in the background during the six days between weekly service visits, continually handling a portion of the physical cleaning workload before the technician ever arrives.

Michaelis said some pool companies already view robotic cleaners as an efficiency tool rather than an optional accessory.

“We constantly hear feedback from service companies on how many more doors they’re able to service, how many more pools they’re able to service, how quickly they can get pools done so that they can get to the next customer, and how many more they can fit within their route,” he said.

In fact, some have made automated cleaning a prerequisite for taking on a customer.

“We actually have some service companies that actually won’t service clients unless they have some sort of robotic cleaner in their pool so that they can be the most efficient when they’re stopping by on a weekly basis,” Michaelis said.

That changes the role a robotic cleaner can play in the relationship between the pool professional and homeowner.

A service company recommending a premium robotic cleaner isn’t necessarily selling its customer a replacement for professional service. It’s giving that customer a machine capable of working between visits while simultaneously giving its technicians a cleaner pool to work with when they arrive.

And as those robots become increasingly autonomous, the value proposition gets stronger.

A cleaner that has to be manually deployed, retrieved, charged, and emptied still asks quite a bit from the homeowner. A cleaner capable of following a schedule, parking itself, recharging and transferring its own debris asks considerably less.

For WYBOT, that’s where the S Series—and particularly products such as the S3—begins to stand out. It’s also where two decades of manufacturing robotic cleaners starts to matter more than how recently consumers began seeing the WYBOT name.

The brand may be relatively new to some pool owners and professionals, but the company behind it isn’t. Now, rather than innovating behind the scenes for other brands, WYBOT is putting that experience behind products designed to connect directly with homeowners and the professionals serving them.

Ready to take a deeper dive?

Listen to our entire conversation with Nathaniel Michaelis, General Manager and Vice President of the Americas for WYBOT on the Pool Magazine Podcast.

New products enter the pool industry every year with impressive technical claims. Getting contractors to actually change the way they work is another matter entirely.

That is particularly true in pool plastering, where experienced applicators tend to know exactly how their preferred mixes behave, how quickly they set and what to expect once a newly finished pool begins its startup. Any additive introduced into that process ultimately has to prove itself in the hands of the people doing the work.

That appears to be where Nano-Set by Sabal Green Group is beginning to gain some traction.

A liquid colloidal silicate admixture, Nano-Set was developed for cementitious pool finishes, designed to help address common plaster issues such as pigment loss, plaster dust and permeability while reducing the pH fluctuations that can make new pool startups more difficult.

Those are meaningful claims in the plaster business. They’re also the kind that contractors ultimately have to prove for themselves on actual jobs.

Jason Evans of Pool Boy Plastering is one of the plasterers who has put Sabal Green’s claims to the test.

“I’ve been talking about this product in our various pool groups and to everybody that I do business with because it’s been a really good admixture that we’ve been adding to our mixes,” Evans said.

Evans didn’t go all-in immediately. Pool Boy Plastering initially tried Nano-Set on a few projects to see how it affected the material and, importantly, how his finishers responded to it.

“We were kind of cautious, but once we used it, the crew liked it, and that’s very important,” Evans said.

His finishers describe the plaster as a little “juicier,” with more cream available during finishing. For some newer mixes that tend to be drier, that added workability was a welcome change.

But what ultimately convinced Evans to begin using the product on every job wasn’t simply how the plaster behaved under the trowel.

It was what happened after his crews left.

Fewer Problems After the Pool Is Filled

Once a newly plastered pool fills, the curing surface and the water begin interacting. That’s when plaster dust, rising pH, staining, scaling and mottling can turn into callbacks for the contractor.

Evans had heard what Nano-Set was supposed to do. He wanted to see whether those claims held up once pools were completed and put through startup.

“When I first heard about it, you hear these claims, it helps with the pH on the startup, it strengthens the plaster. It prevents some issues that have always been there with cement products that are underwater,” Evans said. “And you hear these claims and, finally I tested it, and sure enough, we find there’s a lot less warranty calls.”

Mottling was one area where the difference stood out.

“We haven’t gotten one complaint or call in regards to mottling since using the product” Evans said. “Typically we would get a couple calls a year.”

Operating in South Florida, Evans said his company would occasionally encounter darker areas around main drains, swim-outs and other portions of a finish where moisture could become a factor.

“Knock on wood, we haven’t had any mottling issues at all,” he said. “That’s a thing of the past.”

Part of what Nano-Set is designed to address happens during the normal curing of cement. Calcium hydroxide is produced during that process, and some of it can migrate toward the plaster surface. That’s one contributor to the familiar dust that startup technicians brush from a newly finished pool and to the elevated pH they often contend with during startup.

The mixture reacts with calcium hydroxide to form calcium silicate within the cement matrix. For Evans, the chemistry becomes much easier to appreciate when the pool is filled and brushed for the first time.

“Typically when you fill a pool up, and you brush it, it gets dusty, right?” Evans said. “And that’s the calcium that you’re brushing off the pool plaster. And so that has basically stopped.”

That has changed the startup experience as well.

“It’s just an easier startup. Much fewer chemicals. It’s just easier to balance out your water, and that tends to result in less staining,” Evans said.

Traditionally, managing a new plaster startup can involve repeated acid additions as the pH climbs again between visits. Evans said he’s seeing considerably less of that.

“The amount of acid that they have to add to the water to bring the pH within the acceptable range is a lot less,” he said.

That matters during the first days and weeks when the new finish is especially sensitive to water chemistry.

“The less chemicals you can add, the better during the startup process,” Evans said.

What Changes for the Plaster Crew

Of course, none of those benefits would mean much to a plaster company if the additive made the material considerably more difficult to install.

There are some adjustments.

Evans said crews need to account for it in their water content. He prefers a relatively stiff mud mix and cuts the water accordingly to maintain the proper concentration.

The product also slows the set slightly. In South Florida’s summer heat, Evans said that can work in the crew’s favor, particularly on sunny walls that tend to tighten up quickly. During cooler months, his crews may change the application sequence and begin with shaded walls.

Once his finishers adjusted, Evans said they found the material quite workable.

“My finishers describe it as a little more juicier,” he said. “It seems to bring more cement cream available for the finishing, so it tends to work out to be a smoother, flatter surface using Nano-Set.”

Where Evans sees an even bigger advantage is during exposure.

Quartz and aggregate finishes have to be exposed carefully. If too much of the cement matrix is removed during water washing, rough or inconsistent areas can develop. Evans refers to those areas as washouts.

“The real gold for us is the exposure,” he said.

“The material really binds it all together,” Evans continued. “Washouts, that’s what we call overexposed areas, that’s a thing of the past, and that’s gold for us because whenever you have something like that, it always results in a minor variation in how the pool plaster looks.”

For Evans, eliminating those variations ultimately means fewer opportunities for a customer to find something they don’t like.

“The less variation you have, the higher your customer satisfaction is and life is a lot easier,” he said.

Nano-Set also isn’t tied to a particular aggregate or finish system.

“If it has Portland cement in it, you can use Nano-Set,” Evans said. “It doesn’t matter what aggregate, or if you have different type of pigments. It basically works with the cement and during the cement curing process.”

Evans specifically pointed to PebbleTec, Florida Stucco and Diamond Brite as examples of finishes his company encounters in the field.

That compatibility made it easier for Pool Boy Plastering to move from testing Nano-Set to incorporating it into everyday production.

When Fewer Callbacks Pay for the Product

Adding another material to every plaster job comes with a cost, and Evans initially considered treating Nano-Set as an additional line item. His company’s annual pricing had already been established when they began testing it, however, so Pool Boy Plastering decided to absorb the expense while they evaluated the results.

As the number of completed jobs grew, Evans began looking at the cost differently.

“We figured that we would just eat it, right? We said, let’s try out this product and it seemed to be working good,” he said. “And now we kind of found that with the reduced callbacks and with the easier fire-ups, it basically pays for itself.”

For a plaster company, a callback costs more than the drive back to the job. Someone has to inspect the finish, determine what’s happening, and often walk a builder or homeowner through how cement curing and water chemistry may be affecting its appearance.

“If you’re not getting dark areas in your quartz finishes or your color isn’t getting calcified over, you’re getting less phone calls as a plaster installer,” Evans said. “And that means that you’re able to run your business better.”

“The time I spend doing that is a fraction of what it used to be,” he added, “and this is something that honestly is helping me run my business better.”

Putting It to Work on a Showcase Pool

A recent project for Pool Crafters’ Rocky Miller gave Evans an opportunity to put that confidence to work on a much larger canvas.

The pool features a large lazy river surrounded by extensive natural and artificial rockwork. Pool Boy Plastering installed a PebbleTec Tropical Breeze finish with additional Shimmering Sea abalone shell.

Miller had spent considerable time choosing the finish and was concerned about maintaining the color he wanted without scaling eventually leaving it looking lighter. By then, Evans had already used Nano-Set on roughly 20 pools his company had completed for Miller.

“He did notice that the startups were easier, and he hadn’t got any calls on pool scaling,” Evans said.

That track record gave Miller more confidence in moving forward with his finish selection.

“He didn’t have to put in a super dark surface into his pool to enjoy the blue because it would be whitewashed out from scaling over,” Evans said. “Something like that, it helps, especially on a big project like this.”

The project also illustrates why Nano-Set is beginning to find a following among plasterers.

Technical data can convince a contractor to try a new product. What happens over a trial by fire determines whether it actually stays in the field.

For Evans, Nano-Set has successfully made the leap. What began as a cautious trial is now something he feels compelled to use on every job.

In a trade where experienced applicators can be reluctant to change a process they’ve spent years perfecting, that kind of adoption may say more about the product than anything else.

Ready to take a deeper dive?

Listen to our entire conversation with Jason Evans about Nano-Set on the Pool Magazine Podcast.